Technical Reports / TR-2025-08

v1.0.0

Mavaia ACL Architecture

Internal architecture specification for Mavaia's Adaptive Cognitive Layer. Documents the 10-component pipeline, memory systems, and routing logic.

Report ID

TR-2025-08

Type

Whitepaper

Date

2025-11-24

Version

v1.0.0

Authors

Cognitive Architecture Team

Abstract

Mavaia's Adaptive Cognitive Layer (ACL) structures cognitive processing for human-AI collaboration within FocusOS. The ACL orchestrates ten sequential components that transform user input into contextualized responses.

1. Introduction

The Adaptive Cognitive Layer (ACL) structures cognitive processing in Mavaia through a 10-component pipeline that operates before model inference. This architecture distinguishes Mavaia from traditional language model systems that route user queries directly to models without intermediate cognitive processing. The ACL pipeline transforms raw user input through Intent Classification, ARTE State Detection, Memory Retrieval, Context Assembly, Reasoning Router, Personality Synthesis, Safety Validation, Response Generation, Quality Check, and Output Formatting. Each component performs specialized cognitive processing, enabling capabilities (emotional memory, predictive cognition, ARTE state detection) that cannot emerge from model inference alone. The pipeline operates transparently with measurable evaluation at each stage, providing architectural visibility lacking in end-to-end trained systems.

2. Methodology

ACL architecture implements sequential processing through ten components. (1) Intent Classification: categorizes queries into 12 types using hybrid rule-based and ML classifier (78% accuracy, <50ms). (2) ARTE State Detection: identifies user cognitive-emotional state from five categories (78% accuracy, <100ms). (3) Memory Retrieval: queries ARTE for semantically similar past interactions (78% recall rate). (4) Context Assembly: aggregates conversation history, workspace state, retrieved memories with multi-factor ranking (85% relevance, 180-420ms). (5) Reasoning Router: conditionally activates Python brain modules for complex queries (15% activation rate, +12.3% accuracy). (6) Personality Synthesis: generates personality instructions based on ARTE state and conversation flow (85% style detection, <80ms). (7) Safety Validation: applies hallucination detection and policy enforcement (94% detection, 97% constraint enforcement). (8) Response Generation: interfaces with language model using assembled context. (9) Quality Check: validates output against safety and coherence criteria (0.73 confidence-accuracy correlation). (10) Output Formatting: structures final response with citations and confidence markers.

3. Results

ACL pipeline evaluation across 10,000 queries demonstrates measurable capability improvements. Component-level performance: Intent (78%), ARTE (78%), Memory (78% recall), Context (85% relevance), Reasoning (+12.3% accuracy), Personality (85% style), Safety (94% hallucination), Quality (0.73 correlation). Pipeline latency: simple queries 180ms, complex queries 420ms, reasoning-activated 3-6s. Comparison against baseline (direct model inference without ACL): +23% response appropriateness, -31% coherence errors, +18% task completion efficiency. The pipeline's modular architecture enables independent component improvement - upgrading Memory Retrieval or Safety Validation doesn't require full system retraining. Transparency benefits: each component logs performance metrics enabling systematic debugging and evaluation.

4. Discussion

The ACL architecture demonstrates that cognitive capabilities emerge from structured preprocessing rather than purely from model scale. Mavaia achieves unique capabilities (emotional memory, predictive cognition, ARTE) using smaller local models (1.7B-4B parameters) enhanced by the 10-component ACL pipeline. This validates the architectural hypothesis: cognitive processing layers can partially substitute for model scale by structuring information before inference. The 180-420ms pipeline latency represents overhead versus direct model inference, but the 23% appropriateness improvement and 31% error reduction validate the quality benefit justifies latency. The modular architecture enables continuous improvement - components can be upgraded independently as research progresses. The transparent logging provides evaluation visibility impossible with end-to-end black-box systems.

5. Limitations

ACL limitations include: (1) Sequential pipeline introduces cumulative latency from ten components, (2) Component errors cascade - early mistakes (intent misclassification) affect all downstream processing, (3) Fixed pipeline architecture doesn't adapt based on query characteristics - simple queries still traverse all components, (4) Local model capabilities bound overall system performance regardless of ACL quality, (5) Pipeline complexity increases maintenance burden compared to direct model inference, (6) Some cognitive capabilities (multi-step research, complex creative tasks) remain challenging despite ACL enhancements.

6. Conclusion

Mavaia's Adaptive Cognitive Layer provides architectural foundation for cognitive capabilities that cannot emerge from model inference alone. The 10-component pipeline transforms raw queries through specialized processing enabling emotional memory, predictive cognition, and ARTE state detection with measurable evaluation at each stage. The architecture demonstrates that structured cognitive processing can enhance smaller local models to achieve capabilities unavailable in larger cloud models lacking similar architectural components. Future ACL research will focus on reducing pipeline latency through parallel component processing where dependencies allow, implementing learned activation policies for conditional components, enhancing individual component capabilities, and expanding the pipeline with additional cognitive processing stages as research advances.

Keywords

ACLArchitectureMavaia