Technical Reports / TR-2025-23

v1.0.0

Predictive Reflection Engine

Specification for Mavaia's predictive cognition system achieving 72% forecast accuracy and 73% drift detection. Documents temporal pattern analysis, user behavior prediction, and proactive suggestion generation.

Report ID

TR-2025-23

Type

System Card

Date

2025-11-10

Version

v1.0.0

Authors

Cognitive Architecture Team

Abstract

We present the Predictive Reflection Engine, a cognitive system that analyzes user behavior patterns to forecast future needs and generate proactive suggestions. The system achieves 72% forecast accuracy and 73% drift detection.

1. Introduction

Traditional AI assistants operate reactively, responding to explicit user queries without anticipating future needs. The Predictive Reflection Engine enables Mavaia to analyze temporal patterns in user behavior, forecast likely future requests, and generate proactive suggestions before explicit queries are made. The system operates on three principles: temporal pattern extraction from workspace activity, behavioral trajectory modeling using historical sequences, and confidence-calibrated suggestion generation that balances helpfulness with non-intrusiveness. Implementation spans four components: Temporal Pattern Analyzer (identifies recurring behavior sequences), Trajectory Predictor (forecasts future actions), Suggestion Generator (creates proactive recommendations), and Drift Detector (identifies when predictions become stale).

2. Methodology

The Predictive Reflection Engine analyzes workspace activity across multiple temporal scales: within-session patterns (task sequences during single focus sessions), cross-session patterns (recurring workflows spanning multiple sessions), daily rhythms (time-of-day behavior patterns), and weekly cycles (day-of-week activity patterns). Pattern extraction uses sequence mining algorithms that identify frequent itemsets in user action logs. Trajectory prediction applies temporal modeling to forecast next likely actions based on current context and historical patterns. Suggestion generation creates natural language recommendations with confidence scores, filtering suggestions below 0.65 confidence threshold. Drift detection monitors prediction accuracy over rolling windows, triggering pattern reanalysis when accuracy drops below 70%.

3. Results

Evaluation across 3,000 user sessions showed 72% forecast accuracy for next-action prediction within 15-minute windows. Cross-session pattern detection achieved 68% accuracy for multi-day workflows. Suggestion acceptance rate reached 45% when confidence exceeded 0.75, compared to 23% for suggestions between 0.65-0.75 confidence. Drift detection triggered reanalysis at appropriate times, with 73% accuracy in identifying when behavior patterns had changed. The system maintained average 0.73 confidence-accuracy correlation, indicating well-calibrated prediction uncertainty. Proactive suggestions reduced average task initiation time by 18% for predicted activities.

4. Discussion

The Predictive Reflection Engine demonstrates that AI systems can learn temporal patterns from user behavior without explicit training data. The 72% forecast accuracy proves sufficient for practical proactive assistance - not every prediction needs to be correct if suggestions are non-intrusive and easily dismissed. The 0.65 confidence threshold effectively balances suggestion helpfulness against notification fatigue. The 73% drift detection accuracy ensures the system adapts when user behavior changes, preventing stale predictions from persisting. The 18% task initiation time reduction validates that proactive suggestions provide measurable productivity benefit. The system's architectural approach through behavioral pattern analysis rather than end-to-end prediction models enables transparency and user control.

5. Limitations

Current limitations include: (1) Prediction accuracy limited to activities with sufficient historical patterns, making cold-start periods less effective, (2) Temporal modeling uses fixed time windows (15-min, daily, weekly) that may not align with individual user rhythms, (3) Suggestion generation lacks personalization for communication style and preferences, (4) Drift detection operates reactively rather than anticipating behavior changes, (5) Cross-workspace pattern analysis not yet implemented, limiting prediction context, (6) The system doesn't explicitly model task dependencies or causal relationships between activities, (7) Privacy implications of behavioral prediction require clearer user controls and transparency.

6. Conclusion

The Predictive Reflection Engine enables proactive AI assistance through temporal pattern analysis and behavioral forecasting. The 72% forecast accuracy and 73% drift detection validate that user behavior contains learnable patterns that can inform proactive suggestions. Future work will focus on personalized temporal modeling, cross-workspace pattern integration, causal task dependency modeling, and user-controlled prediction transparency that gives users clear visibility into what patterns are learned and how predictions are generated.

Keywords

PredictionReflectionMavaiaCognition